Re: BUG #14135: SQL command "analyse" is undocumented
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #14135: SQL command "analyse" is undocumented |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTjA2FLqAbFmqErf6vjaiBOv3-asegvpD76OT0nZHQCQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #14135: SQL command "analyse" is undocumented ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #14135: SQL command "analyse" is undocumented
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:05 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > The alias should be documented but I would not think it should be part of > tab completion. > > I'd probably add a note to the analyze areas and, for \h analyse, redirect > to analyze. > > I think altering the syntax would just be noise for little gain. My goal is > if someone sees or types analyse they at least know it's intended behavior > and indeed an alias. > > Not at a terminal now but hopefully the analyze option to vacuum and explain > behave similarly... Some history shows up that: commit: ebe0b236909732c75d665c73363bd4ac7a7aa138 author: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:28:06 +0000 Add ANALYSE spelling of ANALYZE for vacuum. I am not sure that it is worth complicating the docs for the British spelling of this word. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: