On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> I'll produce a patch in the worst case by tomorrow morning my time.
>
> Michael> And attached is the patch. I arrived at the conclusion that
> Michael> the assertion being broken here just needs to be relaxed a bit
> Michael> so as it understands that this code path can be taken by a
> Michael> matview WITH NO DATA. I have bundled a regression test as
> Michael> well. This should be backpatched down to 9.3.
>
> Might it make sense in the regression test to check that ROW_COUNT ends
> up correctly set?
I didn't think that this was necessary, the existence of the relations
being a sufficient guarantee.
--
Michael