>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'll produce a patch in the worst case by tomorrow morning my time.
Michael> And attached is the patch. I arrived at the conclusion that
Michael> the assertion being broken here just needs to be relaxed a bit
Michael> so as it understands that this code path can be taken by a
Michael> matview WITH NO DATA. I have bundled a regression test as
Michael> well. This should be backpatched down to 9.3.
Might it make sense in the regression test to check that ROW_COUNT ends
up correctly set?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)