Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSkqEzTSN5oZ0_9-X5qKOCj3P81XPWW+0B3k9bcqK5bCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It's certainly a bug that the combination of the switches doesn't work, > and I already fixed it (47211af17a). My question was more towards > whether -C is a useful benchmarking option at all. I cannot imagine > a situation in which, if someone said "I'm doing only one transaction per > session, and I have a performance problem", I would not answer "yes, > and you just explained why". -1 for removing it. I found myself in need of it just a couple of days back when testing the GSSAPI encryption patch with a read-only quick load to test if the patch was robust enough to handle a mountain of connection attempts. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: