Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYQWDRobXm=ds7XY8+OvD687L30JPGAh6A5_eGzBXaw=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> It's certainly a bug that the combination of the switches doesn't work, >> and I already fixed it (47211af17a). My question was more towards >> whether -C is a useful benchmarking option at all. I cannot imagine >> a situation in which, if someone said "I'm doing only one transaction per >> session, and I have a performance problem", I would not answer "yes, >> and you just explained why". > > -1 for removing it. I found myself in need of it just a couple of days > back when testing the GSSAPI encryption patch with a read-only quick > load to test if the patch was robust enough to handle a mountain of > connection attempts. I've used it, too. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: