Re: psql \watch versus \timing
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \watch versus \timing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSOi7wNghSPDYkNjYtc36wiHnGMJvXO6pRY4P8Tp4A9Bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql \watch versus \timing (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql \watch versus \timing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:50:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Good catch. So I will remove start_xact code later. >> > Attached patch removes start_xact from PSQLexec. >> Nothing negative to say here :) >> Patch simply removes the second argument of PSQLexec that was set to >> the same value everywhere, aka false as noticed by Heikki. Comments >> and code blocks related to this parameter are removed, and the code >> compiles, passing check-world as well (just kicked the tests in case). > > Uh, where are we on this? Should I commit it? The patch cleaning up the dead code of psql could be clearly applied now. For the feature itself not sure, it may be better to let Fujii-san manage it. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: