Re: WIP: About CMake v2
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRjA1w=Bav0NwWR_8dbdZKAQogcb-6xVCnfM5N_01L+kA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9 Nov. 2016 06:37, "Yury Zhuravlev" <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> This approach I see only in Postgres project and not fully understood. >> Can you explain me more what reasons led to this approach? > > It's predictable. The default has the same result for everyone. I quite like > it myself. +1. Let's tell to the system what we want him to do and not let him guess what we'd like to be done or it will get harder to test and develop code for all kind of code paths with #ifdef's. That's one step away from Skynet. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: