Re: WIP: About CMake v2
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobV80YPttsmAx+w24a0Thrfp9mtg2AC3Q2uSO7qFweF6w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Craig Ringer > <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 9 Nov. 2016 06:37, "Yury Zhuravlev" <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >>> This approach I see only in Postgres project and not fully understood. >>> Can you explain me more what reasons led to this approach? >> >> It's predictable. The default has the same result for everyone. I quite like >> it myself. > > +1. Let's tell to the system what we want him to do and not let him > guess what we'd like to be done or it will get harder to test and > develop code for all kind of code paths with #ifdef's. That's one step > away from Skynet. Exaggerate much? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: