Re: pg_reorg in core?
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_reorg in core? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB7nPqRRwmwd9QYNkmjGuA1aKau9J1bfOj2pH44yYqsDhuMwog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_reorg in core? (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_reorg in core?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote:
-- On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:I don't see any problem in having pg_reorg in PGXN instead.
> If the argument for moving pg_reorg into core is "faster and easier"
> development, well I don't really buy that.
I've tried adding a META.json to the project and it seems working fine
with the pgxn client. It is together with other patches in my own
github fork.
https://github.com/dvarrazzo/pg_reorg/
I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
the ownership.
Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being.
It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: