Re: pg_reorg in core?

(2012/09/21 22:32), Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo 
> <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com <mailto:daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt
>     <schmiddy@gmail.com <mailto:schmiddy@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
>     the ownership.
>
> Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being.
> It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg 
> in pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
>
Hi, I'm Sakamoto, reorg mainainer.
I'm very happy Josh, Michael  and Daniele are interested in reorg.

I'm working on the next version of reorg 1.1.8, which will be released 
in a couple of days.
And I come to think that it is a point to reconsider the way to 
develop/maintain.
To be honest,   we have little available development resources, so no 
additional
features are added recently.  But features and fixes to be done (as Josh 
sums up. thanks).

I think it is a good idea to develop on github. Michael's repo is the root?
After the release of 1.1.8, I will freeze CVS repository and create a 
mirror on github.
# Or Michael's repo will do :)

I have received some patches from Josh, Daniele. It should be developed 
in the next
major version 1.2. So some of them may not be included in 1.1.8 (caz 
it's minor versionup),
but I feel so appreciated.

I think we can discuss further at reorg list.

Sakamoto