Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ8gqTR8=aQy4nfPE+dGK9xK+2X7_En+wKbWtaqALnPvQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have strong opinion about this. There are many tables which
> regression test creates but doesn't drop. But if you strongly think that
> the table must be dropped, I'm OK with that.
This remark is just to limit the amount of trash in the database used
for regression tests. But then if we'd remove everything we would lack
handy material for tests on utilities like database-wide thingies of
the type VACUUM, REINDEX, pg_dump, etc. And we can just drop the
database used for regressions to clean up everything. So that's not
mandatory at all. I tend to always clean up objects in my patches
touching regressions to limit interactions with other tests, but I
guess that's up to the person who wrote the code to decide.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA (work in progress)