Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140828135340.GN7046@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote: > This remark is just to limit the amount of trash in the database used > for regression tests. But then if we'd remove everything we would lack > handy material for tests on utilities like database-wide thingies of > the type VACUUM, REINDEX, pg_dump, etc. And we can just drop the > database used for regressions to clean up everything. So that's not > mandatory at all. I tend to always clean up objects in my patches > touching regressions to limit interactions with other tests, but I > guess that's up to the person who wrote the code to decide. Leaving lingering objects is not a bad thing, particularly if they have unusual properties; they enable somebody pg_dump'ing the database which can be a good test for pg_dump. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: