Re: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQ04vhO1cRqUHRHA=TX2Mxh+8LJui7FXmLA8UcEw-SLMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe? (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe?: snapshots: quiesced andnon-quiesced
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote: > Thomas Güttler wrote: >> We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine. >> >> The virtual machine is managed by the customer. >> >> He does backup the VM. >> >> Is this enough, is this safe? > > I don't know about VMware, I heard about one or two things :) > but the general rule is that > if the backup is truly atomic (it is guaranteed to capture > a consistent state of the file system), you can use it > to backup the database. There are two types of snapshots: quiesced and non-quiesced. You definitely want a quiesced snapshot when taking a backup so as the system gets into a consistent state when working on it. There should be an option related to that on the vSphere client managing the VM, so make sure that quiesced is enabled. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: