Re: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe?: snapshots: quiesced andnon-quiesced
От | Thomas Güttler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe?: snapshots: quiesced andnon-quiesced |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7665556d-390d-996f-1da1-9d076430c88c@thomas-guettler.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Thank you for "quiesced vs non-quiesced". I will ask the company providing the VM. Regards, Thomas Güttler Am 21.09.2017 um 03:48 schrieb Michael Paquier: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote: >> Thomas Güttler wrote: >>> We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine. >>> >>> The virtual machine is managed by the customer. >>> >>> He does backup the VM. >>> >>> Is this enough, is this safe? >> >> I don't know about VMware, > > I heard about one or two things :) > >> but the general rule is that >> if the backup is truly atomic (it is guaranteed to capture >> a consistent state of the file system), you can use it >> to backup the database. > > There are two types of snapshots: quiesced and non-quiesced. You > definitely want a quiesced snapshot when taking a backup so as the > system gets into a consistent state when working on it. There should > be an option related to that on the vSphere client managing the VM, so > make sure that quiesced is enabled. > -- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: