On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 08:58, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I suppose we could attach "autovacuum=off" settings to these tables,
> but it doesn't seem to me that that should be necessary. These test
> cases are several years old and haven't given trouble before.
> Moreover, if that's necessary then there are a lot of other regression
> tests that would presumably need the same treatment.
Is it worth running that animal with log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0
so we can see what's going on in terms of auto-vacuum auto-analyze in
the log?
David