Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL
От | Daniel Farina |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAZKuFZjqxKc2zRXU9Da14ys=KvEiNHjuLsbvwuKYtirJZftOw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Our standard answer when someone asks for $random-auth-method is to > suggest that they find a PAM module for it and use PAM. I wouldn't > want to claim that PAM is a particularly great interface for this > sort of thing, but it's out there and I don't know of any serious > competition. I considered writing a PAM module to do some stuff at one time (to try to solve the two-passwords-for-a-user problem), but the non-intrinsic complexity to perform pretty simple tasks in the whole thing is pretty terrible -- it ended up being more attractive to do fairly ugly role mangling in Postgres's own authentication system. And, like you, I don't know of any serious competition to PAM in performing simple authentication delegations. -- fdr
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: