Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20551.1331861900@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Keystone auth in PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> writes: > From my vantage point, a rehash of federated authentication of some > kind would be enormously useful, but it's not really clear if there > are any concrete implementations worth supporting directly: I only > wish it was much easier to delegate authentication so someone could > implement, say, Keystone without excessive contortion. (Or maybe > someone just needs to vend some advice on the "proper" way to > delegate). Our standard answer when someone asks for $random-auth-method is to suggest that they find a PAM module for it and use PAM. I wouldn't want to claim that PAM is a particularly great interface for this sort of thing, but it's out there and I don't know of any serious competition. The alternative of supporting $random-auth-method directly doesn't scale very nicely... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: