Re: PL/pgSQL 2
От | Joel Jacobson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAASwCXf+kqzQ07ZO5P99FNMvACUfG+BYAvysD7q+PVdCpHv+zQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 (Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@nosys.es>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL 2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@nosys.es> wrote: > We are definitely worse. This is the problem, we only look to our own > belly bottom (if this expression exists in English). All NoSQL scale > *easily*, *transparently* beyond one node. Postgres doesn't. I'm not saying > they don't suck at many many other things, or that some of them may be worse > solution than the problem. But despite JSON/JSONB in pg is awesome, it's far > far away from what we need to compete agains NoSQL in these regards. So the discussion started out with a desire to improve PL/pgSQL. Now somehow NoSQL and JSON is discussed in the same thread. Interesting. Godwin's Law never fails :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: