Re: PL/pgSQL 2

On 09/02/2014 06:27 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@nosys.es> wrote:
>>     We are definitely worse. This is the problem, we only look to our own
>> belly bottom (if this expression exists in English). All NoSQL scale
>> *easily*, *transparently* beyond one node. Postgres doesn't. I'm not saying
>> they don't suck at many many other things, or that some of them may be worse
>> solution than the problem. But despite JSON/JSONB in pg is awesome, it's far
>> far away from what we need to compete agains NoSQL in these regards.
> So the discussion started out with a desire to improve PL/pgSQL. Now
> somehow NoSQL and JSON is discussed in the same thread. Interesting.
> Godwin's Law never fails :-)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Not to mention completely unsubstantiated claims about *all* NoSQL
scaling *easily* and *transparently* beyond one node :)

-- 
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ