Re: PL/pgSQL 2

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep  2, 2014 at 06:57:42PM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > SINGLETON UPDATE ...?
>>
>> Does it come with built-in spell check? :-) It's a bit long to write.
>> I like STRICT, that maps good to what we already have with SELECT ...
>> INTO STRICT.
>
> Spell checker coming in plpgsql3!  ;-)
>
> Anyway, as you have seen, the problem is not creating plpgsql2 --- you
> could do that yourself on your own and distribute it.  What you want is
> for the community to develop/maintain it, and as you have also seen,
> everyone uses plpgsql slightly differently, so if you want the community
> to maintain it, you are only going to get some of the things you want.

Very true, I totally agree.

But what do you think about,
STRICT UPDATE ...?

> Of course, the idea of upgrading plpgsql is long overdue, so it is very
> good we are all talking about it.

I'm very glad you share that opinion. :-)