Re: PL/pgSQL 2

On Tue, Sep  2, 2014 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep  2, 2014 at 06:57:42PM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> > SINGLETON UPDATE ...?
> >>
> >> Does it come with built-in spell check? :-) It's a bit long to write.
> >> I like STRICT, that maps good to what we already have with SELECT ...
> >> INTO STRICT.
> >
> > Spell checker coming in plpgsql3!  ;-)
> >
> > Anyway, as you have seen, the problem is not creating plpgsql2 --- you
> > could do that yourself on your own and distribute it.  What you want is
> > for the community to develop/maintain it, and as you have also seen,
> > everyone uses plpgsql slightly differently, so if you want the community
> > to maintain it, you are only going to get some of the things you want.
> 
> Very true, I totally agree.
> 
> But what do you think about,
> STRICT UPDATE ...?

Seems fine to me.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +