Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM?
От | Alexander Farber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAADeyWiT3puja7HH8edAwDU9cUyb0uD8itogJy59_60hsc2LFA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM? (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM?
Re: Would my postgresql 8.4.12 profit from doubling RAM? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello, thank you for your replies and sorry for the delay in my replying - On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: >> users, and currently work_mem is set to 1M (the default.) If you >> increase that to 16M, that'd be max 1.6G of memory, which you have >> free anyway right now. I did look at the vmstat output, but can't deduce anything from it: # free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 15862 13289 2573 0 588 8407 -/+ buffers/cache: 4293 11569 Swap: 2046 0 2046 # vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu----- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 5 0 256 2610788 602424 8605344 0 0 0 112 0 0 10 0 88 1 0 I'll try changing work_mem to 2MB first - once I upgrade the RAM. Regards Alex
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: