Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA8=A7-u0J9za-du2YwPwOObHq24Dv=WLr4MesiKQShRchp6NQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size
Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:16 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > > This doesn't seem like a reason not to allow a higher limit, like a > > megabyte or so, but I'm not sure that pushing it to the moon would be > > wise. > > > > > Just to get a mental handle on the size of queries we might be > allowing before truncation, I did some very rough arithmetic on what > well known texts might fit in a megabyte. By my calculations you could > fit about four Animal Farms or one Madame Bovary in about a megabyte. > So I think that seems like more than enough :-). (My mind kinda > explores at the thought of debugging a query as long as Animal Farm.) > Turns out my arithmetic was a bit off. Animal Farm is 90 kb, Madame Bovary 678 Kb. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: