Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA8=A7-N=eBL_f3SvSKSg317V_4Es8miQxO-1R7bfe6+y4FAuQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size
Re: [PATCH] Increase the maximum value track_activity_query_size |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > This doesn't seem like a reason not to allow a higher limit, like a > megabyte or so, but I'm not sure that pushing it to the moon would be > wise. > Just to get a mental handle on the size of queries we might be allowing before truncation, I did some very rough arithmetic on what well known texts might fit in a megabyte. By my calculations you could fit about four Animal Farms or one Madame Bovary in about a megabyte. So I think that seems like more than enough :-). (My mind kinda explores at the thought of debugging a query as long as Animal Farm.) cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: