On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item ("fix
>>>> possible confusion between subqueries and subplans").
>>
>>> This open item comes with a patch submitted by Tom Lane. If Tom wants
>>> me to review and (if no problems are found) commit that patch to
>>> resolve this open item, I'm willing to do that. But generally I don't
>>> commit patches submitted by other committers unless that person and I
>>> have agreed on it in advance, which is not currently the case here.
>>
>>> Tom, do you want to commit this, or do you want me to handle it, or
>>> something else?
>>
>> I was not sure if you'd agreed that the patch was correct, and in any
>> case I thought you wanted to fold it into the upperrel consider_parallel
>> patch. I feel no great need to commit it myself, if that's what you
>> meant.
>
> OK, I'll set aside some time for further review and either commit it
> or send an update by COB Thursday US time.
>
I had couple of questions [1] related to that patch. See if you find
those as relevant?
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2ByGs-onuJDy%2BTTqnrnT0hty_QQPC1GipS%2Bce-W3872QQ%40mail.gmail.com
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com