Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZtwZUZYSsva2rf8rYtM8WWbL8H6RBdU8V-VZS5W4cApA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item ("fix >>> possible confusion between subqueries and subplans"). > >> This open item comes with a patch submitted by Tom Lane. If Tom wants >> me to review and (if no problems are found) commit that patch to >> resolve this open item, I'm willing to do that. But generally I don't >> commit patches submitted by other committers unless that person and I >> have agreed on it in advance, which is not currently the case here. > >> Tom, do you want to commit this, or do you want me to handle it, or >> something else? > > I was not sure if you'd agreed that the patch was correct, and in any > case I thought you wanted to fold it into the upperrel consider_parallel > patch. I feel no great need to commit it myself, if that's what you > meant. OK, I'll set aside some time for further review and either commit it or send an update by COB Thursday US time. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: