Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1L2BCOJkOaaNcwKtM9m0nWi9gydBhfxiA1++dKTDpc7uw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together. (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:29 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2022-Jul-29, Peter Smith wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > > > > > I don't object to doing this, but I think these two functions should > > > stay together nonetheless. > > > > If you believe there is still a problem after applying the patch > > please explicitly name what function(s) you think should be moved. > > Well, I checked the commit and the functions I was talking about look OK > now. However, looking again, pg_relation_is_publishable is in the wrong > place (should be right below is_publishable_relaton), and I wonder why > aren't get_publication_oid and get_publication_name in lsyscache.c. > Right, both these suggestions make sense to me. Similarly, I think functions get_subscription_name and get_subscription_oid should also be moved to lsyscache.c. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: