Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20220729095900.kemsantarx4klz5r@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together. (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Jul-29, Peter Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > > > I don't object to doing this, but I think these two functions should > > stay together nonetheless. > > If you believe there is still a problem after applying the patch > please explicitly name what function(s) you think should be moved. Well, I checked the commit and the functions I was talking about look OK now. However, looking again, pg_relation_is_publishable is in the wrong place (should be right below is_publishable_relaton), and I wonder why aren't get_publication_oid and get_publication_name in lsyscache.c. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: