Re: Hash Indexes
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KU3-4SCaDP0=N=24etVVU2Jgw+0=pcc-pxRGqADJgs7Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash Indexes (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash Indexes
Re: Hash Indexes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> [ new patch ] >>> >>> Committed with some further cosmetic changes. >> >> Thank you very much. >> >>> I think it would be worth testing this code with very long overflow >>> chains by hacking the fill factor up to 1000 >> >> 1000 is not a valid value for fill factor. Do you intend to say 100? > > No. IIUC, 100 would mean split when the average bucket contains 1 > page worth of tuples. > I also think so. > I want to split when the average bucket > contains 10 pages worth of tuples. > oh, I think what you mean to say is hack the code to bump fill factor and then test it. I was confused that how can user can do that from SQL command. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: