Re: Hash Indexes
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobbF1GSJ0zVw1uEddvYHwV-CSMFvt9rdJc3_NomrkabEA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash Indexes (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash Indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >>> [ new patch ] >> >> Committed with some further cosmetic changes. > > Thank you very much. > >> I think it would be worth testing this code with very long overflow >> chains by hacking the fill factor up to 1000 > > 1000 is not a valid value for fill factor. Do you intend to say 100? No. IIUC, 100 would mean split when the average bucket contains 1 page worth of tuples. I want to split when the average bucket contains 10 pages worth of tuples. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: