Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+7KWuPue0Pe=oTywT-V2dSNeJxbPeyWp+ZuuJSoAdcSQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
Few other things, I would like you to consider.1. I think disable_parallel_leader_participation related code can be extracted into a separate patch as it is mainly a debug/test aid. You can also fix the problem reported by Mahendra in that context.
2. I think if we cam somehow disallow very small indexes to use parallel workers, then it will be better. Can we use min_parallel_index_scan_size to decide whether a particular index can participate in a parallel vacuum?
Forgot one minor point. Please run pgindent on all the patches.
--
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: