Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+fd4k7djRwAQzRN8X5ZrnQx7BbggewoG_FFPNYmxqfL2i0ZQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 11:57, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Few other things, I would like you to consider. >> 1. I think disable_parallel_leader_participation related code can be extracted into a separate patch as it is mainlya debug/test aid. You can also fix the problem reported by Mahendra in that context. >> >> 2. I think if we cam somehow disallow very small indexes to use parallel workers, then it will be better. Can we use min_parallel_index_scan_size to decide whether a particular index can participate in a parallel vacuum? > > > Forgot one minor point. Please run pgindent on all the patches. Got it. I will run pgindent before sending patch from next time. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: