Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv51pVPWCn09vCqXerHwzMeGJgn3riexn=WwdS2Rsc+oow@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 16, 2024, 02:45 Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a copy of the PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement
draft. This contains a user-facing summary of some of the features that
will be available in the Beta, as well as a call to test. I've made an
effort to group them logically around the different workflows they affect.
A few notes:
* The section with the features is not 80-char delimited. I will do that
before the final copy
* There is an explicit callout that we've added in the SQL/JSON features
that were previously reverted in PG15. I want to ensure we're
transparent about that, but also use it as a hook to get people testing.
When reviewing:
* Please check for correctness of feature descriptions, keeping in mind
this is targeted for a general audience
* Please indicate if you believe there's a notable omission, or if we
should omit any of these callouts
* Please indicate if a description is confusing - I'm happy to rewrite
to ensure it's clearer.
Please provide feedback no later than Wed 2024-05-22 18:00 UTC. As the
beta release takes some extra effort, I want to ensure all changes are
in with time to spare before release day.
"Now as of PostgreSQL 17, you can now use parallel index builds for [BRIN](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/brin.html) indexes."
The 2nd "now" is redundant.
"Finally, PostgreSQL 17 adds more explicitly SIMD instructions, including AVX-512 support for the [`bit_count](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/functions-bitstring.html) function."
Would "SIMD-explicit instructions" be better? Also, I know you may not be using markdown for the final version, but the bit_count backtick isn't matched by a closing backtick.
"[`COPY`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-copy.html), used to efficiently bulk load data into PostgreSQL"
The "used to" makes me stumble into reading it as meaning "it previously could efficiently bulk load data".
Perhaps just add a "which is" before "used"?
"PostgreSQL 17 includes a built-in collation provider that provides similar semantics to the `C` collation provided by libc."
"provider", "provides", and "provided" feels too repetitive.
How about, "PostgreSQL 17 includes a built-in collation provider with semantics similar to the `C` collation offered by libc."?
Regards
Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: