Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis
| От | John Woltman |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+wMe6U5QCFFTCxy_1hM=ThUpVdaWzdnQtSFAkn4ngirVCqymw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
According to "dnf info", the repo is pgdg95, which I got from the Postgres website. Since this looks like a packaging bug and not specifically a Postgres bug, should I submit it pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org?
-John
John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 06/01/2018 10:06 AM, John Woltman wrote:I'm attempting to install PostGIS2 (specifically postgis2_95 for Postgres 9.5) on Fedora 28. When I run ``sudo dnf install postgis23_95`` I get the the following the error:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides geos36 >= 3.6.2 needed by postgis23_95
Fedora 28 provides GEOS 3.6.1. Is my issue something that I should bring up to the Fedora maintainers or to whoever's in charge of the Postgres Yum repos?
What repo source are you using for the PostGIS package?--
Thank you,
John
John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: