Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis

On 06/01/2018 10:27 AM, John Woltman wrote:
> According to "dnf info", the repo is pgdg95, which I got from the 
> Postgres website.  Since this looks like a packaging bug and not 
> specifically a Postgres bug, should I submit it 
> pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>?

No I would file it here:

https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3038

missing packages "proj49" and "geos36" in postgresql 9.5 repository 
(dependencies of "postgis24_95")

You will need either a Postgres community account to log in:

https://www.postgresql.org/account/signup/

or third party accounts, see below:

https://www.postgresql.org/account/auth/4/

> 
> -John
> 
> John Woltman
> TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com 
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 06/01/2018 10:06 AM, John Woltman wrote:
> 
>         I'm attempting to install PostGIS2 (specifically postgis2_95 for
>         Postgres 9.5) on Fedora 28.  When I run ``sudo dnf install
>         postgis23_95`` I get the the following the error:
> 
>         Error:
>             Problem: conflicting requests
>                - nothing provides geos36 >= 3.6.2 needed by postgis23_95
> 
>         Fedora 28 provides GEOS 3.6.1.  Is my issue something that I
>         should bring up to the Fedora maintainers or to whoever's in
>         charge of the Postgres Yum repos?
> 
> 
>     What repo source are you using for the PostGIS package?
> 
> 
> 
>         Thank you,
>         John
> 
>         John Woltman
>         TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Adrian Klaver
>     adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
> 
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com