Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()
| От | Daniele Varrazzo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+mi_8am5aixtKDTttML4Pmeds=CMfbqGOC_1+k6jCzZPKoNDQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>) |
| Список | psycopg |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it> wrote: >> On 10/01/12 09:51, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: >>> >>> I just created a ticket against psycopg2, and Daniele asked me to bring >>> the issue on the list to open it to a wider audience. The ticket is here: >>> >>> >>> http://psycopg.lighthouseapp.com/projects/62710/tickets/88-use-lo_creat-when-possible-instead-of-lo_create >> >> >> The patch seems fine to me. Doesn't add any overhead and improves >> compatibility with an existing product. I vote +1 [that means "unless >> Daniele votes -1 I'll include it" ;)] > > I don't know much about the difference between the two functions: if > anybody has any interesting story about them I'd be happy to know. > Meanwhile I'll make sure we have tests for both the code paths in the > patch. I've made some tests and everything seems fine. I've integrated the patch in my branch. -- Daniele
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: