Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()
От | Daniele Varrazzo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+mi_8Z6RcuYetzTHBZV5fJqo6XCeSr=ao13M4G6XjDZiKFDfw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() (Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create()
|
Список | psycopg |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it> wrote: > On 10/01/12 09:51, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: >> >> I just created a ticket against psycopg2, and Daniele asked me to bring >> the issue on the list to open it to a wider audience. The ticket is here: >> >> >> http://psycopg.lighthouseapp.com/projects/62710/tickets/88-use-lo_creat-when-possible-instead-of-lo_create > > > The patch seems fine to me. Doesn't add any overhead and improves > compatibility with an existing product. I vote +1 [that means "unless > Daniele votes -1 I'll include it" ;)] I don't know much about the difference between the two functions: if anybody has any interesting story about them I'd be happy to know. Meanwhile I'll make sure we have tests for both the code paths in the patch. -- Daniele
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: