On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:04 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 2020-11-21 20:41, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Oops. I guess I'd write something like this. If we just remove it, then
> > there'd no place to add a new server application, and "client applications"
> > would be the only subsection.
>
> I have committed the typo fix. I don't have a well-formed opinion yet
> about whether all the reservations about removing pg_standby have been
> addressed.
I would like to commit this, because "waiting restore commands" have
confusing interactions with my proposed prefetching-during-recovery
patch[1]. Here's a version that fixes an error when building the docs
(there was a stray remaining <xref linkend="pgstandby"/>), and adds a
commit message. Any objections?
Furthermore, I think we should also remove the section of the manual
that describes how to write your own "waiting restore command".
Thoughts?
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGKFeYPL9K%2BSRixcsx1%2B6HsHhqK%2BPOZyrnnZjw1jERpGcQ%40mail.gmail.com