Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47c1a857-3e42-489d-6be3-ee229f970d0c@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] remove pg_archivecleanup and pg_standby (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-11-21 20:41, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:26:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 2020-10-29 03:44, Justin Pryzby wrote: >>> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml >>> index 4e833d79ef..be4292ec33 100644 >>> --- a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml >>> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml >>> @@ -199,6 +199,5 @@ pages. >>> part of the core <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> distribution. >>> </para> >>> - &pgstandby; >>> </sect1> >>> </appendix> >> >> With this removal, that section becomes empty. So you probably want to >> clean up or reorganize this a bit. >> >> See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/contrib-prog.html for the context. > > Oops. I guess I'd write something like this. If we just remove it, then > there'd no place to add a new server application, and "client applications" > would be the only subsection. I have committed the typo fix. I don't have a well-formed opinion yet about whether all the reservations about removing pg_standby have been addressed.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: