Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
| От | Thomas Munro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+hUKGJJeK-cM2Hzymh1Su3-aKQQLp0s1ojwjrRDF3f+oB8iYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Perhaps this is just a question of the machine being too slow to complete > the test, in which case we ought to raise wal_sender_timeout. But it's > weird that it would've started to fail just now, because I don't really > see any changes in those branches that would explain a week-old change > in the test runtime. Unfortunately, eelpout got kicked off the nice shiny ARM server it was running on so last week I moved it to a rack mounted Raspberry Pi. It seems to be totally I/O starved causing some timeouts to be reached, and I'm looking into fixing that by adding fast storage. This may take a few days. Sorry for the noise.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: