Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1531503.1606864037@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > Unfortunately, eelpout got kicked off the nice shiny ARM server it was > running on so last week I moved it to a rack mounted Raspberry Pi. It > seems to be totally I/O starved causing some timeouts to be reached, > and I'm looking into fixing that by adding fast storage. This may > take a few days. Sorry for the noise. Ah-hah. Now that I look, eelpout is very clearly slower overall than it was a couple weeks ago, so all is explained. It might still be reasonable to raise wal_sender_timeout in the buildfarm environment, though. We usually try to make sure that buildfarm timeouts border on ridiculous, not just because of underpowered critters but also for cases like CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS animals. I'm also wondering a bit why the issue isn't affecting the newer branches. It's certainly not because we made the test shorter ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: