Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There may be a larger conversation to be had here about how
> much our CI infrastructure should be detecting.  There seems
> to be a depressingly large gap between what that found and
> what the buildfarm is finding --- not only in portability
> issues, but in things like cpluspluscheck failures, which
> I had supposed CI would find.

+1, Andres had some sanitizer flags in the works (stopped by a weird
problem to be resolved first), and 32 bit CI would clearly be good.
It also seems that ARM is now available to us via CI (either Amazon's
or a Mac), which IIRC is more SIGBUS-y about alignment than x86?

FTR CI reported that cpluspluscheck failure and more[1], so perhaps we
just need to get clearer agreement on the status of CI, ie a policy
that CI had better be passing before you get to the next stage.  It's
still pretty new...

[1] https://cirrus-ci.com/github/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/commitfest/39/3711