Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3889343.1664342078@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> writes: > wrasse is also failing with a bus error, Yeah. At this point I think it's time to call for this patch to get reverted. It should get tested *off line* on some non-Intel, non-64-bit, alignment-picky architectures before the rest of us have to deal with it any more. There may be a larger conversation to be had here about how much our CI infrastructure should be detecting. There seems to be a depressingly large gap between what that found and what the buildfarm is finding --- not only in portability issues, but in things like cpluspluscheck failures, which I had supposed CI would find. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: