Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
| От | Jorge Solórzano |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+cVU8MWeV8P1_47ORiB7_q94i6P=huOaatvQr0DYpD8XT6Avg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Or better yet, simply append .jre8 to the version, that way 42.0.0.jre8 > 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0.jre6 and when Java 9 comes out it will be easy to use .jre9 and there will be no problem to identify what Java version it target.
El mar., 29 de nov. de 2016 10:57 AM, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> escribió:
Vladimir, what do you think about using classifier in pgjdbc? It probably can simplify build of different jar and at the same time have proper versioning in maven.In maven rules 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0 (jre8) so this should help with correct versioning.El lun., 28 de nov. de 2016 3:17 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> escribió:I've pushed 42.0.0-SNAPSHOT to the pgjdbc/master.Vladimir--Jorge
--
Jorge Solórzano
me.jorsol.com
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: