Re: Checksums, state of play
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checksums, state of play |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKvmQVTHhU=wyDRqzTMem-gfbhZp4U1c=STJ728szoc+Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Checksums, state of play (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checksums, state of play
Re: Checksums, state of play |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > As to whether we should increment pd_pagesize_version, I'm not sure > quite what you were saying about that (I think you may have an extra > or missing word there), but I don't think it's necessary here. I said this... On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Do you know of any PostgreSQL variant that can set this byte range to > different values? Not sure what the missing word is there, so I'll ask again. Has EDB or anybody else you know of has used the pd_pagesize_version field for something else, so you'd rather I didn't touch that? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: