Re: Checksums, state of play

On 06.03.2012 19:00, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> As to whether we should increment pd_pagesize_version, I'm not sure
>> quite what you were saying about that (I think you may have an extra
>> or missing word there), but I don't think it's necessary here.
>
> I said this...
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs<simon@2ndquadrant.com>  wrote:
>> Do you know of any PostgreSQL variant that can set this byte range to
>> different values?
>
> Not sure what the missing word is there, so I'll ask again.
>
> Has EDB or anybody else you know of has used the pd_pagesize_version
> field for something else, so you'd rather I didn't touch that?

The EDB page format is exactly the same as the community one. Thanks for 
asking.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com