Re: pg_dump --snapshot
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump --snapshot |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKJz8404hy8hWrU-pdz4XPMBf6UtRnCF1fR0+Z0ZUUjmw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --snapshot (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump --snapshot
Re: pg_dump --snapshot |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 May 2013 19:35, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > It certainly sounds interesting and I like the idea of it, but perhaps > we need a different mechanism than just passing in a raw snapshot, to > address the concerns that Tom raised. It does *not* pass in a raw snapshot. All it does is to allow pg_dump to use an API that is already exposed by the backend for this very purpose, one that has been in Postgres since 9.2. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-SNAPSHOT-SYNCHRONIZATION Minor patch, no amazing new functionality, no drama. --Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: