Re: pg_dump --snapshot
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump --snapshot |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130506183514.GK4361@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --snapshot (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump --snapshot
Re: pg_dump --snapshot |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Andres Freund (andres@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Its rather useful if you e.g. want to instantiate a new replica without > rebuilding pg_dump/pg_restore's capabilities wrt. ordering, parallelism, > separating initial data load from index creation and all that. Which > already has been incompletely reinvented by several solutions :(. Perhaps it's just a wording thing, but I wouldn't use the term "replica" when referring to something built with pg_dump/restore- that should really be reserved for a slave system created through replication. > So besides the above and real problems you point out this seems > worthwile to me... It certainly sounds interesting and I like the idea of it, but perhaps we need a different mechanism than just passing in a raw snapshot, to address the concerns that Tom raised. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: