Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+U5nM+o=fgLJhKWdKfjmfZ5D0sVPq6OLdSiWz6kX4UmHWLUmg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | SQL key word list and SQL:2011 (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On 19 May 2012 14:00, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > What I'd suggest is that we keep only the SQL:2011 column. The > differences from 2003 to 2011 aren't that great that it's very useful to > analyze the differences, and 1999 and 1992 are really only of > archeological interest. The SQL:2011 standard replaces previous standards, so I agree: we should only list the current version of the standard. The previous versions of the standard are simply no longer relevant. If people want that, we could have a little text at bottom saying Changes between 2008 and 2011 etc.. if that really is interesting - and if it really is then it should be listed as incompatibilities in the release notes. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: