SQL key word list and SQL:2011
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | SQL key word list and SQL:2011 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1337450452.10292.11.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011
Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011 Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011 |
Список | pgsql-docs |
I'm updating the SQL key word list in the appendix. Since there is now SQL:2011, this should be included in the table. But we're running out of horizontal space. We currently have Key word | PostgreSQL | SQL:2008 | SQL:2003 | SQL:1999 | SQL-92 In the PDF, we have space for about 5 columns, and currently the SQL-92 column is already in the margin. If we add one more column, it falls off the page. What I'd suggest is that we keep only the SQL:2011 column. The differences from 2003 to 2011 aren't that great that it's very useful to analyze the differences, and 1999 and 1992 are really only of archeological interest. (For example, it's not going to be of any practical relevance to attempt to use a key word that was unreserved in 1999 but reserved later. A number of other vendors will have reserved it by now as well.) We would, however, lose a few key words that were reserved in earlier versions of the standard but then removed (e.g., BIT). Maybe those could be added with a note or something. Thoughts?
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: